Close

    • Weistec Stage 2 supercharged daily driven C63 AMG goes 10.7@130 in the 1/4 mile

      Daily driven 10 second C63 AMG trapping at 130+ in the 1/4 mile? No problem. This C63 AMG is from Long Beach California and was driven up to the Famoso Drag strip. The owner just changed the rear tires and wheels to a drag setup and the result was 10.794 @ 130.23 miles per hour with a very nice 1.612 60 foot. He clearly is hooking up very well and has just about maximized what he can hit with his Stage II 2.3 liter twin screw.


      As a reminder, the Weistec Stage II supercharger consists of the components listed below and is good for an increase of over 144 wheel horsepower over stock. This car also has long tube headers.

      Weistec Stage II M156 supercharger Key Features:


      • 2.3L Twin-Screw Compressor Module Why Twin-Screw?
      • 1000hp Liquid to Air Intercooler Core
      • High Flow Cast Aluminum T6 Hardened Lower Manifold
      • High Flow Cast Aluminum T6 Hardened Throttle Body Inlet Y
      • 45mm Boost Bypass Assembly
      • Billet Aluminum Direct Drive Cradle System
      • Supercharger Serpentine Drive Belt
      • Hard Anodized Billet Aluminum Serpentine Idlers
      • Johnson CM30 30 Liter/Min Intercooler Water Pump
      • Intercooler Water Recovery Tank
      • Cross Flow Heat Exchanger
      • High Flow Fuel Rail System
      • Molded Silicone Couplers
      • Power-Steering Reservoir Relocation Assembly
      • Weistec Engineering Stage 2 Supercharger System ECU Reflash


      Time slip and photos below, density altitude was +291 at the time of the run.






      This article was originally published in forum thread: Weistec Stage 2 supercharged daily driven C63 AMG goes 10.7@130 in the 1/4 mile started by Sticky View original post
      Comments 161 Comments
      1. PetroC63's Avatar
        PetroC63 -
        Nice!

        130 is moving.
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Yeah that's not bad at all.

        I'm wondering what the 3.0 liter setup can do on pump gas at the strip? 135?
      1. onisyndicate's Avatar
        onisyndicate -
        These cars are so awesome! Now was this done with 93 oct or 91?
      1. SLS AMG's Avatar
        SLS AMG -
        very very nice. I love these beastly C63's.
      1. SLS AMG's Avatar
        SLS AMG -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge

        I'm wondering what the 3.0 liter setup can do on pump gas at the strip? 135?
        So the C63 above wasnt running on race gas?
      1. chrisisnapping's Avatar
        chrisisnapping -
        what are the ballpark horsepower figures for this set up?

        130 is moving for sure.
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by SLS AMG Click here to enlarge
        So the C63 above wasnt running on race gas?
        Unless he filled up with race gas at the track then no.
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by chrisisnapping Click here to enlarge
        what are the ballpark horsepower figures for this set up?

        130 is moving for sure.
        Overview of all the setups: http://www.benzboost.com/content.php...th-price-drops
      1. SLS AMG's Avatar
        SLS AMG -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
        Unless he filled up with race gas at the track then no.
        He was on Race gas!Click here to enlarge
      1. Jacob502's Avatar
        Jacob502 -
        Full MS109. You should mention it in the article
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Jacob502 Click here to enlarge
        Full MS109. You should mention it in the article
        It's mentioned in the comments so taken care of. I didn't say what gas he was running one way or another and it's a 91 octane tune I believe.
      1. LZH's Avatar
        LZH -
        I was there and saw this car run, it was hooking up great and the 60' times were impressive.
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LZH Click here to enlarge
        I was there and saw this car run, it was hooking up great and the 60' times were impressive.
        Did you run?
      1. ecampbell's Avatar
        ecampbell -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Jacob502 Click here to enlarge
        Full MS109. You should mention it in the article
        Both my and Jim's car were running 10.7's a couple of years ago without MS109 so I can see this car doing that without race fuel.
      1. LZH's Avatar
        LZH -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
        Did you run?
        No just went out to hang, you know I'm not that interested in drag racing. Mostly went to see the guys from Weistec and Jim. Was a bummer his car didn't run, but I'll let Jim discuss that...
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Whatever it is they will work out the kinks.

        I'll probably do a drag rental in March.
      1. Jacob502's Avatar
        Jacob502 -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by ecampbell Click here to enlarge
        Both my and Jim's car were running 10.7's a couple of years ago without MS109 so I can see this car doing that without race fuel.
        I never said that car couldn't elapse that time without race gas! Only stating what it had, as it WAS on race gas.

        In addition, your car was running A different setup than the setup on the car above. You had race ported heads, and higher boost on your 2.3L. In addition, I recall you had a RACE tune. I remember you were making 664 whp and Jim was making 660. I also recall you ran a 10.8-10.9. So you can't compare your car with the one above as your car was more powerful during that period, and still is :-)
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Jacob502 Click here to enlarge
        In addition, your car was running A different setup than the setup on the car above. You had race ported heads, and higher boost on your 2.3L. In addition, I recall you had a RACE tune. I remember you were making 664 whp and Jim was making 660. I also recall you ran a 10.8-10.9. So you can't compare your car with the one above as your car was more powerful during that period, and still is :-)
        This is all accurate.
      1. TT C6's Avatar
        TT C6 -
        I'd like to know what this car weighed at the track after the addition of the blower.

        I have a TON of respect for the OEM stock C63.
        But, I would simply buy a CTS-V with a OEM supercharger and bolt ons, and be faster, before I would do an aftermarket supercharger on a C63, and be slower.

        http://www.dragtimes.com/Cadillac-CT...lip-26047.html


        I am hoping the next W205 C63 can duplicate these times with just a tune, and maybe bolt ons.
        If so, and it gets a DCT and AWD, I am in for one.
      1. Jacob502's Avatar
        Jacob502 -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by TT C6 Click here to enlarge

        I have a TON of respect for the OEM stock C63.
        But, I would simply buy a CTS-V with a OEM supercharger and bolt ons, and be faster, before I would do an aftermarket supercharger on a C63, and be slower.




        .
        Sorry but that has to be one of the dumbest posts I have read recently. I have seen NA Bolt-on C63's overtake CTS-V's many times here in Qatar.

        A supercharged C63 would humiliate any CTS-V with bolt ons on the street. I ran a couple of bolt on CTS-V's runnning on methanol with my supercharged SL63 and overtook them easily. @Sirex63 , also ran with a couple bolt on CTS-V's in the UAE with his supercharged C63 and did the same thing
        Slower you say? lol, really shows that you know nothing about both cars.